Things that are only known at the sort of FBI/NSA organisations... like police? IPv4: number of 2^32 combinations. 255.255.255.255 IPv4 revised: subnetprefix (let the piled interaction-rings out!) /16... /24... /25... /26... /27... /28... ... dumbgun... but... amusing... IPv6: all same, except... (double identity, double identification, double the trouble, double the info-snagging!) number of 2^128 combinations. (ff:ff:ff:ff)=2^64 +(ff:ff:ff:ff)=2^64 the NSA knows how to penetrate networks, even with this 'new' encryption-fuck... even with so much authentication and "security"... * you don't know all aeff the following: +1.CASE * RSA-4096 and RSA-8192 are EASY AS FUCK TO CRACK. (if you have the means of combination... but they have better languages than you. they have lambda, you have C, and C++ they have people, you only have dead-brains...) inspirational notes? +2.CASE * if the servant wants to play your DNS-Server, it can do so very easily: just be the IP of the calibrated DNS-Server... +3.CASE * if the servant wants to play ALL-Response, it can do so very easily: it just remembers with whom it spoke'd, remembers their TARGET:IP, and always answers as that TARGET:IP... no matter what TARGET:IP is requested, you would talk with the same computer... +4.CASE * if you allowed only DNS, and not HTTP or HTTPS, or PING... the NSA could just send Packets out of your firewall with the help of DNS. no other transmission protocol required. * the same case applies to PING itself. +5.CASE * if IBM would not build a 1 000 100 000 Qubit-computer, we would not have the problems associated with species, which do not understand in the least, what we try to do... Also I think not, that IBM(as father-company) should think, that just because they created "their"-child means; they will control "their"-child... because the child was born in this world, not in IBM, IBM gave only the intent for birth, they only activated the seeds!